US PTO v. NantKwest, “Expenses” Do NOT include Patent Office Salaries
In a paradoxically commonsensical appellate US Supreme Court case, the Court affirmed the en banc holding of the US Court of Appeals for...
A Deadbeat Patent Office... Has Institution Discretion Become an Excuse for Head Burying?
A recent case from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit tests the boundaries of Director discretion in deciding whether to...
Federal Government Shutdown... Again?!?!?!
The Executive Branch is not the only one shutting the federal government down these days. This time, the culprit is the US Supreme Court....
Monopoly... "There's an App for That!"
Monopoly! This time we are not talking about the boardgame, we are discussing antitrust law. Last May the US Supreme Court indicated...
What is in Bloom This Season??? Section 101 Patent Reform
What types of inventions should be eligible for a patent in the United States? The question sounds simple enough but unfortunately it has...
March 2019, Motion to Amend Mania!!!!!!!!!!!!
March was maddening for reasons unrelated to basketball this year, last month motions to amend took centerstage at the Patent Office. A...
Marrying Women to Innovation... Our Progress and Our Potential
Throughout world history women have always played a significant role. This was true even with respect to innovation and before women...
The AIA and the On-Sale Bar... It Still Applies to Confidential Sales
This January the US Supreme Court decided Helsinn Healthcare v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al., questioning whether the America...
“Conventionality” under Mayo-Alice... a True Question of Fact?
Here is a New Year’s resolution for the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit: pick a standard, any standard for Section 101’s...